Genetic Engineering

Sources: by-source mapping (no direct match found yet)

Key Ideas (IELTS Simon)

Positives

Negatives


Part 1 — Questions (0 total)

No Part 1 questions mapped from by-source files.


Part 2 — Cue Cards (0 total)

No Part 2 cue cards mapped from by-source files.


Part 3 — Discussion Questions (0 total)

No Part 3 questions mapped from by-source files.

Generated Practice Questions

Additional IELTS-style questions for practice (generated from topic themes).

Part 1 (5 questions)

  1. Are you interested in science and technology?
  2. Do you read news about medical or scientific advances?
  3. Do you pay attention to food labels?
  4. Would you try genetically modified food?
  5. Do you think science can solve major health problems?

Part 2 — Cue Cards (2 cards)

Cue card 1

Describe a scientific development you have heard about

You should say: - what it is - where you heard about it - what it is used for - and explain what you think about it

Part 3 follow-up questions: 1. What are the potential benefits of genetic engineering? 2. What dangers might genetic engineering create? 3. Should genetically modified foods be labelled clearly? 4. Should there be strict laws controlling genetic research? 5. Is it ethical to modify human genes?

Cue card 2

Describe a type of food that you think is healthy or unhealthy

You should say: - what the food is - how often you eat it - where it comes from - and explain why you think it is healthy or unhealthy

Part 3 follow-up questions: 1. Should GM foods be sold in supermarkets? 2. What are the advantages of organic farming? 3. Do people in your country care about how food is produced?

Part 3 — Discussion (4 questions)

  1. Could genetic engineering cure inherited diseases?
  2. Should parents be allowed to choose their baby's characteristics?
  3. How might cloning technology change medicine in the future?
  4. What regulations should govern genetic research?

Sample Answers Band 6.5–7.0

Part 1 — Genetic Engineering

1. Are you interested in science and food production?

Yes, to some extent. I would not say I am an expert, but science and food production affects daily life, so I find it worth thinking about. For example, when I read news or talk with friends, this topic often comes up naturally.

2. Is science and food production important in your country?

Yes, definitely. In my country, science and food production matters because it influences families, young people, and the wider community. It may not be something people discuss every day, but it has a real impact on quality of life.

3. Has science and food production changed in recent years?

Yes, quite a lot. Technology, education, and modern lifestyles have changed the way people think about science and food production. Older people may have more traditional views, while younger people tend to be more open and practical.

4. Do young people care about science and food production?

I think many young people do care, especially when it affects their future directly. However, they may express interest through social media or online discussions rather than traditional conversations.

Part 2 — Cue card sample

A scientific development that changed the world

I would like to talk about a scientific development that changed the world, which is closely connected to science and food production.

I first became aware of it a few years ago, and since then it has stayed in my mind because it reflects both the positive and negative sides of modern life.

The positive side is that it shows the value of better crops and medical treatment. This is important because people often need practical examples, not just abstract ideas, to understand a topic clearly.

At the same time, it also reminds me of the problem of ethical risks and unknown long-term effects. That makes the topic more complex, because there is rarely a perfect solution.

Overall, I find it meaningful because it helps me think more deeply about society and my own choices. If I had to summarise my feeling, I would say it is both interesting and relevant to everyday life.

Part 3 — Discussion

1. Why is science and food production important?

It is important because it affects individuals and society at the same time. For example, better crops and medical treatment can improve peoples quality of life, while ethical risks and unknown long-term effects can create long-term problems. That is why this topic deserves more attention from both citizens and governments.

2. What are the advantages related to science and food production?

The main advantages are connected to better crops and medical treatment. If this area is managed well, people can benefit through better opportunities, more convenience, and a higher standard of living. It can also help communities become more organised and forward-thinking.

3. What are the disadvantages or risks?

The biggest risk is ethical risks and unknown long-term effects. If people ignore this issue, it can lead to social pressure, inequality, or environmental damage depending on the situation. In my view, the negative side should not be exaggerated, but it should be taken seriously.

4. What should governments do about science and food production?

Governments should create clear policies, invest in public education, and make sure rules are enforced fairly. For example, they can fund useful programmes and raise public awareness. However, government action alone is not enough; individuals also need to change their habits.

5. Do you think science and food production will change in the future?

Yes, I think it will continue to change, mainly because of technology, globalisation, and younger generations. People are becoming more aware of both benefits and risks. In the future, I expect more practical solutions rather than simple arguments for or against it.

6. Do older and younger people think differently about science and food production?

Yes, in many cases. Older people may value tradition, stability, and personal experience, while younger people are often influenced by online information and global trends. Neither side is completely right or wrong; the best approach is to combine experience with fresh ideas.